Excess on an Australian water damage claim
Excess, not deductible — and more often than people expect, excesses plural. How many you pay depends on how many policies the water crossed, not on how many rooms it reached.
The word is excess. Not deductible. That is not pedantry: it is the fastest way to tell whether a cost guide you are reading was written for Australia or copied from somewhere else, and if the vocabulary is imported the dollar figures usually are too.
One event, more than one excess
The thing people are not told, and find out at settlement, is that the excess is per claim and a single water event can produce several claims.
Three arrangements, three outcomes:
- Combined building and contents, water confined to your home. One policy, one claim, one excess. This is what everyone assumes.
- Building and contents insured separately. Two policies, two claims, two excesses, and two independent sets of Code timeframes running at different speeds. Common with investment properties, and common where a landlord insures the building and a tenant insures their own contents.
- Strata. The owners corporation insures the building; you insure what is inside the lot. Water crossing between common property and a lot almost always produces a claim on each. Two excesses, two assessors, and two organisations each reasonably certain the other one should be paying.
If you are in strata, lodge on the same day the strata manager does. The two claims will be assessed by different people and the one lodged later ends up waiting for the other. Reg 33(1)(d) brings a strata title residence inside the prescribed contracts, so the standard cover position is the same for both — it is the sequencing that costs you weeks.
The flood excess
Many Australian policies carry a separate flood excess, and in higher-risk areas it can be several thousand dollars against a standard excess in the hundreds. That is a direct, quantifiable consequence of which provision applies to your water, which is why what flood legally means is not an academic question. Water that came across the ground from a surcharged stormwater drain is not flood under reg 34(1), and if it attracts a flood excess anyway, that is worth challenging in writing on day one rather than at settlement.
Get the restoration quoted before you decide anything
Knowing the drying cost is what tells you whether claiming is worth the excess.
Whether claiming is worth it at all
This is the arithmetic nobody does, because nobody publishes the numbers that would let them. Here it is.
A small escape of water — one room, carpet and underlay, caught the same day — is, on the published rates this site reproduces, a job of roughly $1,260 excluding GST for the drying alone: call-out, an hour of extraction, two carpet dryers and a dehumidifier for the published three-day minimum. If your excess is in that neighbourhood, claiming buys you very little and starts a claims-history entry you keep for years.
A four-day dry across two rooms is about $1,913, and most of a house for a week with HEPA filtration is about $8,885 — before anything is replaced and before anyone puts the building back. At that end, the excess is noise.
The cost page has the calculator, and it shows every line it added so you can check the arithmetic against the published rate card.
What a cash settlement changes
General Insurance Code of Practice, paragraph 79 · 2020 Code, October 2023 update, read 20 September 2026
Offered a cash settlement on a home building policy, you are entitled to material explaining how they work and how the figure was decided.
A cash settlement is the insurer paying you a figure instead of managing the work. It can be the right answer — you control the trades, you control the timing, and you are not waiting on a builder somebody else appointed. It can also be how a claim quietly becomes your problem.
Two provisions to use. The first is paragraph 79 above: you are entitled to material explaining how cash settlements work and how the figure was decided. The second is General Insurance Code of Practice, paragraph 61 — where a home building claim needs a scope of works, the insurer must give you information to help you understand it. A cash figure without a scope behind it is a number you cannot check.
And the one nobody mentions: Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) s 57; Insurance Contracts Regulations 2017 (Cth) reg 38. Reg 38 sets the rate by formula off the 10-year Bond yield. It is not something you have to ask for as a favour.
If the insurer appoints the repairer
Where the insurer selected and directly authorised the repairer, two Code paragraphs work in your favour and most people never invoke them.
General Insurance Code of Practice, paragraph 86 · 2020 Code, October 2023 update, read 20 September 2026
Where the insurer selected and directly authorised the repairer, it accepts responsibility for the quality of the work and the materials, and complaints about them go through its complaints process.
General Insurance Code of Practice, paragraph 87 · 2020 Code, October 2023 update, read 20 September 2026
If an insurer-appointed repairer’s work has to be rectified and that leaves you needing accommodation beyond what the policy would give you, the insurer arranges it and covers the reasonable cost.
That second one is worth reading twice. If insurer-appointed work has to be redone and that leaves you needing accommodation or a hire car beyond what the policy would otherwise give you, the insurer arranges it and pays the reasonable cost. It is not a favour and it is not discretionary.
Get the drying priced before you decide
Knowing what the work costs is what tells you whether the excess is worth paying. Quotes are free and commit you to nothing.
Your enquiry is ready to send
Here is what happens after you submit:
- Your answers go to restoration companies that advertise for your postcode.
- No more than three of them may contact you, using the details you gave.
- You decide who, if anyone, you use. You are committed to nothing, and this does not lodge, alter or affect an insurance claim.
We are not a restoration company and we do not attend, assess or repair anything.
Common questions
Is an excess the same as a deductible?
Same idea, different word. Australian policies say excess. American material says deductible. If you are reading a restoration cost guide that says deductible, it was not written for the Australian market and its dollar figures are probably not Australian either.
Do I pay the excess to the insurer or to the restorer?
Usually to whoever the insurer tells you. Where the insurer appoints the restorer and pays them directly, the excess is commonly deducted from the settlement or collected by the restorer on the insurer's behalf. Where you appoint your own, you pay the invoice and the insurer reimburses less the excess.
Can I have more than one excess on one event?
Yes, and it is common. The multiplier is the number of policies the water crossed, not the number of rooms. Building and contents insured separately is two claims. A strata lot and common property is two claims on two different policies.
What is a flood excess?
A separate, usually larger excess that applies specifically where the cause is flood as reg 34(1) defines it. It is one of the practical reasons the definition of flood is worth arguing about: the same water damage can attract a very different out-of-pocket depending on which provision it falls under.
Does an excess apply if the claim is declined?
No. An excess is deducted from a settlement. If there is no settlement there is nothing to deduct it from -- but you are then paying the whole restoration invoice yourself, which is a worse outcome, not a better one.
Sources cited on this page
- Insurance Contracts Regulations 2017 (Cth)
- General Insurance Code of Practice (2020 Code, October 2023 update)
- General Insurance Code of Practice, paragraph 79
- General Insurance Code of Practice, paragraph 61
- Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) s 57; Insurance Contracts Regulations 2017 (Cth) reg 38
Every figure above was read from the source it is attributed to on 20 September 2026. How we check this.